Evan Grant from the assigned TED video defines cymatics as: the process of visualizing sound.
This fits perfectly into synesthesia, which according to Wikipedia is, a neurologically-based condition in which stimulation of one sensory or cognitive pathway leads to automatic, involuntary experiences in a second sensory or cognitive pathway.
Cymatics uncovers a synesthetic quality of nature. If sounds can create intricate images and patterns, what else have we been missing out on? Again according to Wikipedia, not everybody has been missing out - Pharell, Kandinsky, and Liszt are all "synesthetes". Artists have sought synesthesia in their works for years. If a painter, filmmaker, or composer can invoke a sensory response that is outside their medium, they're definitely on to something. An interesting image from Grant's talk, this is a picture of a Beethoven piece 'cymaticized':
This picture shows the potential for a cross-over of an artist's material.
It's really interesting to see a song that was never intended to be 'seen,' take such an almost equally attractive piece in an entirely different medium. It seems to support a case for an inherent beauty in a classic composition. But who knows, the rest of the song could have looked like garbage...
Cymatics is just one form of synesthesia; the sight of sound. Other types of synesthesia include seeing color, identifying numbers with letters, or hearing visuals.
Norman McLaren response:
- Chaotic at first. Repetition of colors and shapes set to old swing/jazz.
- Lines are personified as if they are dancing. Characters shaped out of abstracted images.
- Large variety of technique explored throughout.
- Pace also varies a lot.
No comments:
Post a Comment